Discussion:
Canada's income gap widens
(too old to reply)
40%wereÇonned
2011-07-13 23:48:53 UTC
Permalink
Doesn't help to have rightwing governments in our provinces and in Ottawa, does it? Harper is
about to give the biggest earners - the corporations - billions in tax cuts. Nice for them.
But for the rest of us . . . . .
_______________________________
CBC News Jul 13, 2011


Canada's income gap widens, report says

The income gap between rich and poor in Canada widened in the period from 1993 to 2009, the
Conference Board of Canada reported Wednesday.

The richest Canadians increased their share of total national income while the poor and those
with middle incomes saw their portions shrink, according to the board's analysis, entitled "How
Canada Performs."

Incomes of the poor increased marginally in the period, it said, but the gap between rich and
poor widened.

The average income of the poorest Canadians rose from $12,400 in 1976 to $14,500 in 2009.

However, the gap between the real average income of the richest 20 per cent of Canadians and the
poorest 20 per cent widened from $92,300 in 1976 to $117,500 in 2009.

"While the poor are minimally better off in an absolute sense, they are significantly worse off
in a relative sense," said board CEO Anne Golden in a release.

"High inequality raises two questions. First, what is the impact on the economic well-being of a
country? The answer is that high inequality can diminish economic growth if it means that the
country is not fully using the skills and capabilities of all its citizens or if it undermines
social cohesion, leading to increased social tensions."

"Second, high inequality raises a moral question about fairness and social justice."

A graph showing the distribution of income across five equal portions of the Canadian
population. (Conference Board of Canada)The average income in 1976 was $51,100. By 2009, it had
increased by 17 per cent to $59,700, even after adjusting for inflation.

But using the measure of median income, which divides the sample into two equal parts and better
reflects how the majority of people are doing, the growth was only 5.5 per cent.

Another measure, the Gini index, suggests how the income gap has grown from 1993 to 2008.

The index number corresponds to the percentage share of total income that would need to be
redistributed to achieve exact income equality, from 0 to one. (Zero means everyone has the same
income and one means one person has all the earnings.)

Canada's 2009 Gini index of 0.32 meant that 32 per cent of the country's national income would
need to be redistributed in order to have complete equality of income.

The pattern of inequality growth throughout the past three decades has been uneven, the board
said.

Poverty among elderly rises

The income gap narrowed in the 1980s, with the Gini index reaching a low of 0.28 in 1989, but
remained around 0.32 in the 2000s.

The study found inequality is rising worldwide, but that two countries most similar with Canada
in terms of per capita income had narrower gaps. Austria's was 0.265 and Denmark's was 0.232.

The board found that every province except Ontario reduced its share of the population living in
low income in the period.

"Recent data, however, indicates that income inequality rose during and after the recession," it
said.

"Between 2007 and 2009, seven out of ten provinces experienced a rise in their low-income
rates — Prince Edward Island, Saskatchewan, and New Brunswick were the exceptions. The largest
jump occurred in Alberta, where the low-income rate rose from 6.6 per cent to 9.9 per cent."

The study concluded poverty among the elderly, especially women, has risen since the mid-1990s,
following a dramatic drop over 20 years.

Between 2006 and 2009, the number of low-income seniors rose by almost nearly 128,000, with 70
per cent of those being women.
Juris Diction
2011-07-14 23:08:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by 40%wereÇonned
Doesn't help to have rightwing governments in our provinces and in Ottawa,
does it? Harper is
about to give the biggest earners - the corporations - billions in tax cuts.
Nice for them.
But for the rest of us . . . . .
_______________________________
CBC News Jul 13, 2011
Canada's income gap widens, report says
The income gap between rich and poor in Canada widened in the period from 1993 to 2009, the
Conference Board of Canada reported Wednesday.
The richest Canadians increased their share of total national income while
the poor and those
with middle incomes saw their portions shrink, according to the board's
analysis, entitled "How
Canada Performs."
Incomes of the poor increased marginally in the period, it said, but the gap
between rich and
poor widened.
The average income of the poorest Canadians rose from $12,400 in 1976 to $14,500 in 2009.
However, the gap between the real average income of the richest 20 per cent
of Canadians and the
poorest 20 per cent widened from $92,300 in 1976 to $117,500 in 2009.
"While the poor are minimally better off in an absolute sense, they are
significantly worse off
in a relative sense," said board CEO Anne Golden in a release.
"High inequality raises two questions. First, what is the impact on the
economic well-being of a
country? The answer is that high inequality can diminish economic growth if
it means that the
country is not fully using the skills and capabilities of all its citizens or
if it undermines
social cohesion, leading to increased social tensions."
"Second, high inequality raises a moral question about fairness and social justice."
A graph showing the distribution of income across five equal portions of the Canadian
population. (Conference Board of Canada)The average income in 1976 was
$51,100. By 2009, it had
increased by 17 per cent to $59,700, even after adjusting for inflation.
But using the measure of median income, which divides the sample into two
equal parts and better
reflects how the majority of people are doing, the growth was only 5.5 per cent.
Another measure, the Gini index, suggests how the income gap has grown from 1993 to 2008.
The index number corresponds to the percentage share of total income that would need to be
redistributed to achieve exact income equality, from 0 to one. (Zero means
everyone has the same
income and one means one person has all the earnings.)
Canada's 2009 Gini index of 0.32 meant that 32 per cent of the country's
national income would
need to be redistributed in order to have complete equality of income.
The pattern of inequality growth throughout the past three decades has been
uneven, the board
said.
Poverty among elderly rises
The income gap narrowed in the 1980s, with the Gini index reaching a low of
0.28 in 1989, but
remained around 0.32 in the 2000s.
The study found inequality is rising worldwide, but that two countries most
similar with Canada
in terms of per capita income had narrower gaps. Austria's was 0.265 and
Denmark's was 0.232.
The board found that every province except Ontario reduced its share of the
population living in
low income in the period.
"Recent data, however, indicates that income inequality rose during and after
the recession," it
said.
"Between 2007 and 2009, seven out of ten provinces experienced a rise in their low-income
rates — Prince Edward Island, Saskatchewan, and New Brunswick were the
exceptions. The largest
jump occurred in Alberta, where the low-income rate rose from 6.6 per cent to
9.9 per cent."
The study concluded poverty among the elderly, especially women, has risen
since the mid-1990s,
following a dramatic drop over 20 years.
Between 2006 and 2009, the number of low-income seniors rose by almost nearly
128,000, with 70
per cent of those being women.
Thanks CBC. You are truly the "fair and balanced" newsreporter out there.
Loading...